Electronics buyers research harder than any other consumer, touching a dozen creators before they buy — and then last-click hands the whole commission to one of them.
A typical electronics purchase involves a launch video, two comparison reviews, a long-term follow-up and a price check. Every one of those creators contributed. Last-click attribution pays exactly one, usually the reviewer whose link happened to be open at checkout, which pushes the whole creator ecosystem toward bottom-funnel coupon content and away from the review depth that actually sells the product.
Marketplace leakage makes it worse: the buyer is convinced by a creator and then buys on a marketplace, where the brand sees the revenue but not the reason for it.
Every one of these is a structural property of how consumer electronics is bought — not a reporting bug that a better dashboard fixes.
A single purchase can involve five or more creator touches across weeks; last-click credits one and zeroes the rest.
Demand created on social converts on a marketplace, severing the link between creator effort and attributable revenue.
Buyers wait for a discount, so the final click is almost always a deal or coupon source rather than the creator who did the persuading.
Electronics returns are expensive, and commission paid at checkout has to be recovered afterwards through clawbacks.
Commission budget is locked into a non-custodial smart-contract escrow. Spend can never exceed what was locked, and the creator can see the money is real before agreeing to post.
Attribution rides on the link and the resulting order record rather than on a third-party cookie, so it survives the delay, the device switch and the forward.
Both the brand and the creator read the same record. Neither has to trust the other's dashboard, and neither has to accept a private database as the arbiter of a disputed number.
Refunded and returned orders are excluded automatically by the contract rather than clawed back afterwards. The creator is paid in USDC in days, not in 30 to 90 days.
| For a consumer electronics brand | Traditional affiliate platforms | Post2Cash |
|---|---|---|
| Who holds the commission budget | The network's own bank account | ✓ A non-custodial escrow no one — including Post2Cash — can divert |
| Where the sale record lives | The network's private database | ✓ On-chain, independently verifiable by both sides |
| Returns and refunds | Clawbacks against future statements | ✓ Excluded automatically before any money moves |
| Payout speed | 30–90 days, with silent delays | ✓ Days — auto-released at the close of the return window |
| Budget exposure | Open-ended until the program is paused | ✓ Capped at the pre-funded campaign escrow |
The rule matters less than the fact that it is fixed before the campaign runs and enforced automatically. Setting the split at launch, in a contract both sides can read, removes the after-the-fact renegotiation that makes multi-touch attribution contentious.
Yes. Commission held in escrow through the return window releases only against orders that settled clean, which for a high-return category is the difference between reported and realised performance.
No. Brands fund a campaign and manage it from an ordinary web dashboard; the on-chain record exists so that the numbers can be independently checked, not so that anyone has to operate a wallet to run a campaign.
A monthly subscription from $99 plus a 5% fee on commission payouts. No enterprise retainer, no percent-of-GMV. Creators join free.
See Pricing▶ How It Works